[madman71]

Who do you guys think is the most aggressive (content provider wise) in scanning the net and looking for their content to have it removed?

I know of two providers that are very aggressive. At least i think.

1. Melissa Midwest (very, very hard to find working links)


2. BIM (body in mind) - I think most of us know about this provider or the mouthpiece trolling many forums & harassing people.

and in contrast, who do you think doesnt care?

discuss

[BiGFiST]

MPLStudios is passive, they just remove content when they see it or are notified. But they do it fast from what I see, sometimes within 24 hours. BiM seems to hunt down users and uses scare tactics and is somewhat successfull.

As for sites that do not care, the vast majority. It's pretty much a fact that users browsing forums like this one or google up some models are not going to pay for a subscription ever.

I own a 'fine art' paysite myself, I can't be bothered with it's content appearing here. I'm proud that my content appears here. I love to read comments about my sets. As long as the images contain the text link I'm fine with it. Seriously, sites like BiM are overreacting.

[Deacon55]

Playboy without a doubt.

[Gargeltje]

Originally Posted by BiGFiST

I own a 'fine art' paysite myself

If I may be so bold;
Which one?

[WallyW]

I don't think Melissa Midwest is that agressive. I find working links of her stuff quite often. Not a big fan of most of her stuff though.

And when you say content provider, is that referring to internet models, video subscription websites? Cause if its internet models than the most aggressive would have to be Callista Model.
Posts of her "pay / members only / zips / etc "get taken down as quick as they are posted.

[sod628]

Callista is the reason I found this forum.

I've been waiting for that fateful PM full of her stuff, but even that won't come.

[bill_az]

Originally Posted by WallyW

I don't think Melissa Midwest is that agressive. I find working links of her stuff quite often. Not a big fan of most of her stuff though.

And when you say content provider, is that referring to internet models, video subscription websites? Cause if its internet models than the most aggressive would have to be Callista Model.
Posts of her "pay / members only / zips / etc "get taken down as quick as they are posted.

I agree about Melissa Midwest--her content is vanilla to say the least, not worth the $30 or so to sign up for a month. Not to mention pled guilty to two obscenity arrests in Nebraska, and missed being rung up on an accessory to rape charge over that girl she took to the Bubba the Love Sponge show.

The independent model sites are usually the ones who search for their content: the have the spare time and ususally a boyfriend/suitcase pimp to help them out. Plus they want to keep their names somewhat subdued--most of them are not in it for the long haul, and want something to do after their shelf life has expired without getting gawked at by some creep at the local Vons.

The larger groupings of semi-pro models like the Aziani models and full-time porn performers who do the BangBros, etc, content are too busy, don't know where to start looking, and probably like the added notariety.